Monday, February 16, 2026
HomeNewsCourt Can't Force Dialogue Between Political Parties Over Elections, Says Chief...

Court Can’t Force Dialogue Between Political Parties Over Elections, Says Chief Justice

Published on

Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial has ruled that the courts cannot force the government and opposition to hold negotiations as former Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) senator advocate Farooq H Naek told the court that only the Senate chairman can act as a facilitator between political parties since he represents a political forum.

At the previous hearing, the court had asked political parties to hold negotiations to end the impasse over the delay of elections. However, the ruling coalition criticised the top judiciary for “interfering in political matters” and refused to comply with the directives.

During today’s hearing, Attorney General of Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Usman Awan told the court that the government and opposition had decided to hold a meeting on April 26, saying that Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz’s (PML-N) Ayaz Sadiq and Khawaja Saad Rafique met PTI’s Asad Qaiser on April 25. But Asad Qaiser refused to hold talks over the matter, saying he was not authorised.

Justice Bandial asked in what capacity was Senate Chairman Sadiq Sanjarani contacted to serve as a facilitator of the dialogue since he was neither the representative of the government nor the opposition.

“If the government was serious about negotiations, it would have made efforts itself,” said the CJP.

The top judge remarked that the court cannot force the government and opposition to hold negotiations, stressing that it only sought adherence to the Constitution and an end to the deadlock over the delay of elections.

During the hearing, PPP lawyer Farooq H. Naek told the court that the coalition parties had agreed to hold talks with PTI and Senate was the only forum where all political parties were present. He also made it clear that the Senate chairman was playing the role of a facilitator during the negotiations since he represents a political forum. He maintained that this is a political issue, which will only be decided by politicians.

The CJP had also called PTI’s Shah Mehmood Qureshi to the rostrum to present his party’s perspective during the hearing.

Latest articles

Overlooking Homegrown Hate, Pakistan Hesitates to Call Islamabad Blast Anti-Shia Violence

ISLAMABAD - Just hours before a suicide bomber struck the Khadija Tul Kubra Shia mosque in Islamabad during Friday...

How Imaan-Hadi Conviction Marks the Death of Fair Trial in Pakistan

Last week, a trial court in Islamabad convicted human rights lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha under...

PTI’s Ambiguous Rhetoric on Taliban Is Dangerous for Pakistan’s Counter-Extremism Efforts

This reporting was supported by the International Women’s Media Foundation’s Lauren Brown Fellowship. Islamabad - Shafiullah Jan, special assistant to...

How My Daughter’s Trial Exposes Pakistan’s Assault on Human Rights

My daughter, a human rights lawyer, and her husband are currently on trial in Pakistan under cybercrime charges for...

600 Students Affected As Blast Destroys Government School in Waziristan

This reporting was supported by the International Women’s Media Foundation’s Lauren Brown Fellowship. ISLAMABAD - Militants in Pakistan’s volatile Waziristan...

Unseen Victims: How Pakistan’s Drone War is Haunting Tirah Valley

This reporting was supported by the International Women’s Media Foundation’s Lauren Brown Fellowship. Tirah Valley, Pakistan - After three months...

Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial has ruled that the courts cannot force the government and opposition to hold negotiations as former Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) senator advocate Farooq H Naek told the court that only the Senate chairman can act as a facilitator between political parties since he represents a political forum.

At the previous hearing, the court had asked political parties to hold negotiations to end the impasse over the delay of elections. However, the ruling coalition criticised the top judiciary for “interfering in political matters” and refused to comply with the directives.

During today’s hearing, Attorney General of Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Usman Awan told the court that the government and opposition had decided to hold a meeting on April 26, saying that Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz’s (PML-N) Ayaz Sadiq and Khawaja Saad Rafique met PTI’s Asad Qaiser on April 25. But Asad Qaiser refused to hold talks over the matter, saying he was not authorised.

Justice Bandial asked in what capacity was Senate Chairman Sadiq Sanjarani contacted to serve as a facilitator of the dialogue since he was neither the representative of the government nor the opposition.

“If the government was serious about negotiations, it would have made efforts itself,” said the CJP.

The top judge remarked that the court cannot force the government and opposition to hold negotiations, stressing that it only sought adherence to the Constitution and an end to the deadlock over the delay of elections.

During the hearing, PPP lawyer Farooq H. Naek told the court that the coalition parties had agreed to hold talks with PTI and Senate was the only forum where all political parties were present. He also made it clear that the Senate chairman was playing the role of a facilitator during the negotiations since he represents a political forum. He maintained that this is a political issue, which will only be decided by politicians.

The CJP had also called PTI’s Shah Mehmood Qureshi to the rostrum to present his party’s perspective during the hearing.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Also Read

How The PPP Played Both Sides While Passing The...

Journalists across Pakistan are out on the streets protesting...

PPP Leader Says PECA Amendments Will Undermine Freedom of...

ISLAMABAD: The Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) bill passed...

Amid Economic Crisis, Govt Runs Pro-Army Campaign On Media

Amid the economic crisis, the ruling coalition government is...

2013 General Elections In Pakistan: When Anti-Taliban Parties Faced...

While the government's stance on elections wherein it cites...