Sunday, January 26, 2025
HomeNewsCourt Can't Force Dialogue Between Political Parties Over Elections, Says Chief...

Court Can’t Force Dialogue Between Political Parties Over Elections, Says Chief Justice

Published on

Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial has ruled that the courts cannot force the government and opposition to hold negotiations as former Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) senator advocate Farooq H Naek told the court that only the Senate chairman can act as a facilitator between political parties since he represents a political forum.

At the previous hearing, the court had asked political parties to hold negotiations to end the impasse over the delay of elections. However, the ruling coalition criticised the top judiciary for “interfering in political matters” and refused to comply with the directives.

During today’s hearing, Attorney General of Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Usman Awan told the court that the government and opposition had decided to hold a meeting on April 26, saying that Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz’s (PML-N) Ayaz Sadiq and Khawaja Saad Rafique met PTI’s Asad Qaiser on April 25. But Asad Qaiser refused to hold talks over the matter, saying he was not authorised.

Justice Bandial asked in what capacity was Senate Chairman Sadiq Sanjarani contacted to serve as a facilitator of the dialogue since he was neither the representative of the government nor the opposition.

“If the government was serious about negotiations, it would have made efforts itself,” said the CJP.

The top judge remarked that the court cannot force the government and opposition to hold negotiations, stressing that it only sought adherence to the Constitution and an end to the deadlock over the delay of elections.

During the hearing, PPP lawyer Farooq H. Naek told the court that the coalition parties had agreed to hold talks with PTI and Senate was the only forum where all political parties were present. He also made it clear that the Senate chairman was playing the role of a facilitator during the negotiations since he represents a political forum. He maintained that this is a political issue, which will only be decided by politicians.

The CJP had also called PTI’s Shah Mehmood Qureshi to the rostrum to present his party’s perspective during the hearing.

Latest articles

PPP Leader Says PECA Amendments Will Undermine Freedom of Expression

ISLAMABAD: The Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) bill passed by Pakistan's National Assembly has been criticized by human rights...

4 Policemen Abducted By Militants In South Waziristan

PESHAWAR, Pakistan: A group of terrorists abducted four policemen after carrying out an attack on a police post in...

Taliban Plotting to Assassinate Ex-Waziristan MNA Mohsin Dawar, Agencies Warn

ISLAMABAD: The security agencies in Pakistan have said that the Taliban are plotting to assassinate former MNA Mohsin Dawar...

Military Operation Being Planned in Kurram As Violence Continues Despite Peace Deal

The restive town of Parachinar continues to face a lack of necessities and adequate humanitarian aid, as the Kurram...

Cholistan Farmers’ Longstanding Struggle for Land and Water Rights Remains Overlooked

Cholistan, a vast desert in Pakistan’s Punjab province, covers an area of 6.6 million acres and spans the districts...

Minor Christian Boy Jailed for Blasphemy in Sargodha Despite Juvenile Status

SARGODHA, PAKISTAN: A teenage Christian boy in Sargodha has been in prison on blasphemy charges for over a year,...

Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial has ruled that the courts cannot force the government and opposition to hold negotiations as former Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) senator advocate Farooq H Naek told the court that only the Senate chairman can act as a facilitator between political parties since he represents a political forum.

At the previous hearing, the court had asked political parties to hold negotiations to end the impasse over the delay of elections. However, the ruling coalition criticised the top judiciary for “interfering in political matters” and refused to comply with the directives.

During today’s hearing, Attorney General of Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Usman Awan told the court that the government and opposition had decided to hold a meeting on April 26, saying that Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz’s (PML-N) Ayaz Sadiq and Khawaja Saad Rafique met PTI’s Asad Qaiser on April 25. But Asad Qaiser refused to hold talks over the matter, saying he was not authorised.

Justice Bandial asked in what capacity was Senate Chairman Sadiq Sanjarani contacted to serve as a facilitator of the dialogue since he was neither the representative of the government nor the opposition.

“If the government was serious about negotiations, it would have made efforts itself,” said the CJP.

The top judge remarked that the court cannot force the government and opposition to hold negotiations, stressing that it only sought adherence to the Constitution and an end to the deadlock over the delay of elections.

During the hearing, PPP lawyer Farooq H. Naek told the court that the coalition parties had agreed to hold talks with PTI and Senate was the only forum where all political parties were present. He also made it clear that the Senate chairman was playing the role of a facilitator during the negotiations since he represents a political forum. He maintained that this is a political issue, which will only be decided by politicians.

The CJP had also called PTI’s Shah Mehmood Qureshi to the rostrum to present his party’s perspective during the hearing.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Also Read

PPP Leader Says PECA Amendments Will Undermine Freedom of...

ISLAMABAD: The Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) bill passed...

Amid Economic Crisis, Govt Runs Pro-Army Campaign On Media

Amid the economic crisis, the ruling coalition government is...

2013 General Elections In Pakistan: When Anti-Taliban Parties Faced...

While the government's stance on elections wherein it cites...

PPP Leader Who Disappeared From Karachi Remains Missing After...

No progress has been made in the case of...