Monday, March 10, 2025
HomeNewsFate Of Law Proposing 5-year Jail Term For 'Ridiculing Institutions' Hangs...

Fate Of Law Proposing 5-year Jail Term For ‘Ridiculing Institutions’ Hangs In Balance As Lawmakers Divided 

Published on

ISLAMABAD: Cabinet members on Wednesday contested a law seeking stricter punishment for ‘ridiculing and scandalising the state institutions’.

According to the bill, titled Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2023, whoever makes, publishes, circulates any statement or disseminates information, through any medium, with an intention to ridicule or scandalise the judiciary, the armed forces or any of their member will be guilty of an offence punishable with imprisonment of up to five years or with a fine which may extend to Rs1 million or with both.

The legislation also proposes that the offender be arrested without a warrant and calls for the offence to be non-bailable and non-compoundable which could only be challenged in a sessions court.

During the cabinet session, the lawmakers, mainly from Pakistan People’s Party’s, within the ruling alliance contested the proposed law.

They termed the proposed amendments to the penal code against basic human rights.

The lawmakers were of the view that the proposed legislation then should cover every segment of society, including politicians, and media persons among others.

According to reports, PPP leaders Sherry Rehman, Naveed Qamar, and Hina Rabbani Khar were among those who strongly opposed the proposed bill. Meanwhile, Khawaja Saad Rafique was the only Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz lawmaker to have opposed the bill.

After the opposition from the cabinet members, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif formed a cabinet committee to decide the matter.

The proposed amendments have come under harsh criticism from human rights activists, as well as lawmakers.

 

Latest articles

In Powerful Verdict, Islamabad High Court Upholds Conviction of Rapist While Defining ‘Consent’

ISLAMABAD: Upholding the conviction of a man charged with raping a 20-year-old woman, the Islamabad High Court judge Justice...

22 Ahmadis Arrested From Place of Worship Under Pressure From Extremist Mob in Sialkot

LAHORE: Under pressure from Islamist extremist groups, police arrested 22 members of the Ahmadi minority community, including children, in...

How The PPP Played Both Sides While Passing The Draconian PECA Amendments

Journalists across Pakistan are out on the streets protesting against The Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act (PECA) 2025...

Looking Back at 2024 Election Violence In Balochistan That The Rest of Pakistan Ignored

This report is part of Dissent Today’s special series documenting violence and alleged irregularities during Pakistan’s 2024 general elections.  Balochistan,...

A Year After Elections, Ex-Waziristan Parliamentarian Unable to Find Justice for Fallen Comrades

This report is part of Dissent Today's special series documenting violence and alleged irregularities during Pakistan's 2024 general elections.  When...

Pakistan Govt’s Plan To Send Afghan Refugees Back To Afghanistan Raises Concerns From UNHCR

ISLAMABAD: The United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) voiced their concerns...

ISLAMABAD: Cabinet members on Wednesday contested a law seeking stricter punishment for ‘ridiculing and scandalising the state institutions’.

According to the bill, titled Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2023, whoever makes, publishes, circulates any statement or disseminates information, through any medium, with an intention to ridicule or scandalise the judiciary, the armed forces or any of their member will be guilty of an offence punishable with imprisonment of up to five years or with a fine which may extend to Rs1 million or with both.

The legislation also proposes that the offender be arrested without a warrant and calls for the offence to be non-bailable and non-compoundable which could only be challenged in a sessions court.

During the cabinet session, the lawmakers, mainly from Pakistan People’s Party’s, within the ruling alliance contested the proposed law.

They termed the proposed amendments to the penal code against basic human rights.

The lawmakers were of the view that the proposed legislation then should cover every segment of society, including politicians, and media persons among others.

According to reports, PPP leaders Sherry Rehman, Naveed Qamar, and Hina Rabbani Khar were among those who strongly opposed the proposed bill. Meanwhile, Khawaja Saad Rafique was the only Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz lawmaker to have opposed the bill.

After the opposition from the cabinet members, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif formed a cabinet committee to decide the matter.

The proposed amendments have come under harsh criticism from human rights activists, as well as lawmakers.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Also Read

Supreme Court Of Pakistan Is Not Just The Chief...

On March 1, a five-member bench headed by Chief...

Legislatue Fights Back: Another Bill Regulating Suo Motu Litigations...

In response to the Supreme Court's decision to halt...

Supreme Court Denies Social Media Reports Claiming Judges Engaged...

The Supreme Court has denied social media reports claiming...

Here’s How Chief Justice’s Suo Motu Powers Undermine Democracy

This article is part of a series titled “Is...