Monday, January 13, 2025
HomeNewsFate Of Law Proposing 5-year Jail Term For 'Ridiculing Institutions' Hangs...

Fate Of Law Proposing 5-year Jail Term For ‘Ridiculing Institutions’ Hangs In Balance As Lawmakers Divided 

Published on

ISLAMABAD: Cabinet members on Wednesday contested a law seeking stricter punishment for ‘ridiculing and scandalising the state institutions’.

According to the bill, titled Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2023, whoever makes, publishes, circulates any statement or disseminates information, through any medium, with an intention to ridicule or scandalise the judiciary, the armed forces or any of their member will be guilty of an offence punishable with imprisonment of up to five years or with a fine which may extend to Rs1 million or with both.

The legislation also proposes that the offender be arrested without a warrant and calls for the offence to be non-bailable and non-compoundable which could only be challenged in a sessions court.

During the cabinet session, the lawmakers, mainly from Pakistan People’s Party’s, within the ruling alliance contested the proposed law.

They termed the proposed amendments to the penal code against basic human rights.

The lawmakers were of the view that the proposed legislation then should cover every segment of society, including politicians, and media persons among others.

According to reports, PPP leaders Sherry Rehman, Naveed Qamar, and Hina Rabbani Khar were among those who strongly opposed the proposed bill. Meanwhile, Khawaja Saad Rafique was the only Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz lawmaker to have opposed the bill.

After the opposition from the cabinet members, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif formed a cabinet committee to decide the matter.

The proposed amendments have come under harsh criticism from human rights activists, as well as lawmakers.

 

Latest articles

Cholistan Farmers’ Longstanding Struggle for Land and Water Rights Remains Overlooked

Cholistan, a vast desert in Pakistan’s Punjab province, covers an area of 6.6 million acres and spans the districts...

Minor Christian Boy Jailed for Blasphemy in Sargodha Despite Juvenile Status

SARGODHA, PAKISTAN: A teenage Christian boy in Sargodha has been in prison on blasphemy charges for over a year,...

Taliban, ISIS Fuelled The Sectarian Clashes in Parachinar, Says Ex-MNA

Clashing tribes in the restive Kurram district of Pakistan's Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province finally signed a peace agreement on Wednesday to...

How Pakistan’s Peripheries Dissented in 2024

In 2024, democracy in Pakistan suffered setbacks on many fronts. Among these setbacks was the state’s denial — through...

UN Rapporteurs Ask Pakistan To Investigate Militant Attacks On Girls’ Schools In Waziristan

ISLAMABAD: The United Nations special rapporteurs have written a letter to the government of Pakistan, voicing their concerns over...

Human Rights Commission of Pakistan Condemns Conviction of Civilians by Military Courts

ISLAMABAD: The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) has condemned the conviction of 25 Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) supporters by military...

ISLAMABAD: Cabinet members on Wednesday contested a law seeking stricter punishment for ‘ridiculing and scandalising the state institutions’.

According to the bill, titled Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2023, whoever makes, publishes, circulates any statement or disseminates information, through any medium, with an intention to ridicule or scandalise the judiciary, the armed forces or any of their member will be guilty of an offence punishable with imprisonment of up to five years or with a fine which may extend to Rs1 million or with both.

The legislation also proposes that the offender be arrested without a warrant and calls for the offence to be non-bailable and non-compoundable which could only be challenged in a sessions court.

During the cabinet session, the lawmakers, mainly from Pakistan People’s Party’s, within the ruling alliance contested the proposed law.

They termed the proposed amendments to the penal code against basic human rights.

The lawmakers were of the view that the proposed legislation then should cover every segment of society, including politicians, and media persons among others.

According to reports, PPP leaders Sherry Rehman, Naveed Qamar, and Hina Rabbani Khar were among those who strongly opposed the proposed bill. Meanwhile, Khawaja Saad Rafique was the only Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz lawmaker to have opposed the bill.

After the opposition from the cabinet members, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif formed a cabinet committee to decide the matter.

The proposed amendments have come under harsh criticism from human rights activists, as well as lawmakers.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Also Read

Supreme Court Of Pakistan Is Not Just The Chief...

On March 1, a five-member bench headed by Chief...

Legislatue Fights Back: Another Bill Regulating Suo Motu Litigations...

In response to the Supreme Court's decision to halt...

Supreme Court Denies Social Media Reports Claiming Judges Engaged...

The Supreme Court has denied social media reports claiming...

Here’s How Chief Justice’s Suo Motu Powers Undermine Democracy

This article is part of a series titled “Is...