Friday, February 13, 2026
HomeNewsFate Of Law Proposing 5-year Jail Term For 'Ridiculing Institutions' Hangs...

Fate Of Law Proposing 5-year Jail Term For ‘Ridiculing Institutions’ Hangs In Balance As Lawmakers Divided 

Published on

ISLAMABAD: Cabinet members on Wednesday contested a law seeking stricter punishment for ‘ridiculing and scandalising the state institutions’.

According to the bill, titled Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2023, whoever makes, publishes, circulates any statement or disseminates information, through any medium, with an intention to ridicule or scandalise the judiciary, the armed forces or any of their member will be guilty of an offence punishable with imprisonment of up to five years or with a fine which may extend to Rs1 million or with both.

The legislation also proposes that the offender be arrested without a warrant and calls for the offence to be non-bailable and non-compoundable which could only be challenged in a sessions court.

During the cabinet session, the lawmakers, mainly from Pakistan People’s Party’s, within the ruling alliance contested the proposed law.

They termed the proposed amendments to the penal code against basic human rights.

The lawmakers were of the view that the proposed legislation then should cover every segment of society, including politicians, and media persons among others.

According to reports, PPP leaders Sherry Rehman, Naveed Qamar, and Hina Rabbani Khar were among those who strongly opposed the proposed bill. Meanwhile, Khawaja Saad Rafique was the only Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz lawmaker to have opposed the bill.

After the opposition from the cabinet members, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif formed a cabinet committee to decide the matter.

The proposed amendments have come under harsh criticism from human rights activists, as well as lawmakers.

 

Latest articles

Overlooking Homegrown Hate, Pakistan Hesitates to Call Islamabad Blast Anti-Shia Violence

ISLAMABAD - Just hours before a suicide bomber struck the Khadija Tul Kubra Shia mosque in Islamabad during Friday...

How Imaan-Hadi Conviction Marks the Death of Fair Trial in Pakistan

Last week, a trial court in Islamabad convicted human rights lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha under...

PTI’s Ambiguous Rhetoric on Taliban Is Dangerous for Pakistan’s Counter-Extremism Efforts

This reporting was supported by the International Women’s Media Foundation’s Lauren Brown Fellowship. Islamabad - Shafiullah Jan, special assistant to...

How My Daughter’s Trial Exposes Pakistan’s Assault on Human Rights

My daughter, a human rights lawyer, and her husband are currently on trial in Pakistan under cybercrime charges for...

600 Students Affected As Blast Destroys Government School in Waziristan

This reporting was supported by the International Women’s Media Foundation’s Lauren Brown Fellowship. ISLAMABAD - Militants in Pakistan’s volatile Waziristan...

Unseen Victims: How Pakistan’s Drone War is Haunting Tirah Valley

This reporting was supported by the International Women’s Media Foundation’s Lauren Brown Fellowship. Tirah Valley, Pakistan - After three months...

ISLAMABAD: Cabinet members on Wednesday contested a law seeking stricter punishment for ‘ridiculing and scandalising the state institutions’.

According to the bill, titled Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2023, whoever makes, publishes, circulates any statement or disseminates information, through any medium, with an intention to ridicule or scandalise the judiciary, the armed forces or any of their member will be guilty of an offence punishable with imprisonment of up to five years or with a fine which may extend to Rs1 million or with both.

The legislation also proposes that the offender be arrested without a warrant and calls for the offence to be non-bailable and non-compoundable which could only be challenged in a sessions court.

During the cabinet session, the lawmakers, mainly from Pakistan People’s Party’s, within the ruling alliance contested the proposed law.

They termed the proposed amendments to the penal code against basic human rights.

The lawmakers were of the view that the proposed legislation then should cover every segment of society, including politicians, and media persons among others.

According to reports, PPP leaders Sherry Rehman, Naveed Qamar, and Hina Rabbani Khar were among those who strongly opposed the proposed bill. Meanwhile, Khawaja Saad Rafique was the only Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz lawmaker to have opposed the bill.

After the opposition from the cabinet members, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif formed a cabinet committee to decide the matter.

The proposed amendments have come under harsh criticism from human rights activists, as well as lawmakers.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Also Read

Supreme Court Of Pakistan Is Not Just The Chief...

On March 1, a five-member bench headed by Chief...

Legislatue Fights Back: Another Bill Regulating Suo Motu Litigations...

In response to the Supreme Court's decision to halt...

Supreme Court Denies Social Media Reports Claiming Judges Engaged...

The Supreme Court has denied social media reports claiming...

Here’s How Chief Justice’s Suo Motu Powers Undermine Democracy

This article is part of a series titled “Is...