Friday, February 13, 2026
HomeNews'Weak Evidence': Noor Mukadam's Killer Challenges Death Sentence In Supreme Court

‘Weak Evidence’: Noor Mukadam’s Killer Challenges Death Sentence In Supreme Court

Published on

Zahir Jaffar, who was convicted and sentenced to death for killing 27-year-old woman Noor Mukadam in Islamabad, has approached the Supreme Court against the verdict, raising 23 objections.

A trial court awarded a death sentence to Jaffer last February, for murdering and decapitating 27-year-old Noor Mukadam in Islamabad on July 20, 2021. Noor Muqaddam was found beheaded at a residence in Islamabad’s upscale Sector F-7/4.

Zahir Jaffer was arrested from the spot covered in blood.

After the trial court had sentenced Jaffer to death, he had approached the Islamabad High Court, which not only upheld the trial court’s death sentence against him for the brutal murder, but also turned his life imprisonment for rape into a death sentence.

Jaffer has approached the Supreme Court now, raising 23 objections against his conviction, reported Dawn.

Filing an appeal through his lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar in the Supreme Court on April 12, he said the IHC’s verdict was erroneous for 23 reasons.

Claiming the case was dealt with “differently” than the routine cases, the appeal stated that “weak and incomplete” evidence was presented against the convict. It added that the prosecution also “failed to bring on record solid, concrete evidence, hence the charge was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt”.

Jaffer also raised objections over the First Information Report (FIR), claiming it was registered with a delay and contained “hearsay evidence”.

The convict also accused the prosecution of introducing a key witness for a “cover-up”.

Jaffer also claimed that the courts did not evaluate electronic data as per the laws set by the Supreme Court.

The appellant also raised objections over the postmortem report of Noor Mukadam, and maintained that he was not given a free trial as the media hype influenced the courts’ proceedings, as well as a criminal investigation.

Zahir Jaffer also said that his mental health was not examined properly.

Latest articles

Overlooking Homegrown Hate, Pakistan Hesitates to Call Islamabad Blast Anti-Shia Violence

ISLAMABAD - Just hours before a suicide bomber struck the Khadija Tul Kubra Shia mosque in Islamabad during Friday...

How Imaan-Hadi Conviction Marks the Death of Fair Trial in Pakistan

Last week, a trial court in Islamabad convicted human rights lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha under...

PTI’s Ambiguous Rhetoric on Taliban Is Dangerous for Pakistan’s Counter-Extremism Efforts

This reporting was supported by the International Women’s Media Foundation’s Lauren Brown Fellowship. Islamabad - Shafiullah Jan, special assistant to...

How My Daughter’s Trial Exposes Pakistan’s Assault on Human Rights

My daughter, a human rights lawyer, and her husband are currently on trial in Pakistan under cybercrime charges for...

600 Students Affected As Blast Destroys Government School in Waziristan

This reporting was supported by the International Women’s Media Foundation’s Lauren Brown Fellowship. ISLAMABAD - Militants in Pakistan’s volatile Waziristan...

Unseen Victims: How Pakistan’s Drone War is Haunting Tirah Valley

This reporting was supported by the International Women’s Media Foundation’s Lauren Brown Fellowship. Tirah Valley, Pakistan - After three months...

Zahir Jaffar, who was convicted and sentenced to death for killing 27-year-old woman Noor Mukadam in Islamabad, has approached the Supreme Court against the verdict, raising 23 objections.

A trial court awarded a death sentence to Jaffer last February, for murdering and decapitating 27-year-old Noor Mukadam in Islamabad on July 20, 2021. Noor Muqaddam was found beheaded at a residence in Islamabad’s upscale Sector F-7/4.

Zahir Jaffer was arrested from the spot covered in blood.

After the trial court had sentenced Jaffer to death, he had approached the Islamabad High Court, which not only upheld the trial court’s death sentence against him for the brutal murder, but also turned his life imprisonment for rape into a death sentence.

Jaffer has approached the Supreme Court now, raising 23 objections against his conviction, reported Dawn.

Filing an appeal through his lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar in the Supreme Court on April 12, he said the IHC’s verdict was erroneous for 23 reasons.

Claiming the case was dealt with “differently” than the routine cases, the appeal stated that “weak and incomplete” evidence was presented against the convict. It added that the prosecution also “failed to bring on record solid, concrete evidence, hence the charge was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt”.

Jaffer also raised objections over the First Information Report (FIR), claiming it was registered with a delay and contained “hearsay evidence”.

The convict also accused the prosecution of introducing a key witness for a “cover-up”.

Jaffer also claimed that the courts did not evaluate electronic data as per the laws set by the Supreme Court.

The appellant also raised objections over the postmortem report of Noor Mukadam, and maintained that he was not given a free trial as the media hype influenced the courts’ proceedings, as well as a criminal investigation.

Zahir Jaffer also said that his mental health was not examined properly.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Also Read

IHC Upholds Death Sentence Of Zahir Jaffer In Noor...

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has upheld the death...