<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bill Archives - Dissent Today</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dissenttoday.net/tag/bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dissenttoday.net/tag/bill/</link>
	<description>Speaking Truth to Power</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 12:55:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>RTI Act: PTI Lawmaker Wants Citizens&#8217; Access To Parliament&#8217;s Records Restricted</title>
		<link>https://dissenttoday.net/news/rti-act-pti-lawmaker-wants-citizens-access-to-parliaments-records-restricted/</link>
					<comments>https://dissenttoday.net/news/rti-act-pti-lawmaker-wants-citizens-access-to-parliaments-records-restricted/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News Desk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 12:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dissenttoday.net/?p=1543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Senator Wajid Iqbal and Balochistan Awami Party (BAP) Senator Manzoor Ahmed have proposed changes to the information act bill, suggesting restricting the public&#8217;s right to information from the National Assembly and Senate, including their secretariats, committees, and members. The members of civil society have criticised the move, calling it &#8220;regressive&#8221;. The Rights [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://dissenttoday.net/news/rti-act-pti-lawmaker-wants-citizens-access-to-parliaments-records-restricted/">RTI Act: PTI Lawmaker Wants Citizens&#8217; Access To Parliament&#8217;s Records Restricted</a> appeared first on <a href="https://dissenttoday.net">Dissent Today</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Senator Wajid Iqbal and Balochistan Awami Party (BAP) Senator Manzoor Ahmed have proposed changes to the information act bill, suggesting restricting the public&#8217;s right to information from the National Assembly and Senate, including their secretariats, committees, and members. The members of civil society have criticised the move, calling it &#8220;regressive&#8221;.</p>
<p>The Rights of Access to Information Act 2017 provides an overall legal framework for the enforcement of citizens&#8217; right to information. It ensures that everyone shall have the fundamental right of access to information and promote the purpose of making the Government more accountable to its people, and of improving participation by the people in public affairs, and promoting good governance.</p>
<p>The proposed amendment to the act suggests that the public would not be able to seek information from the National Assembly and Senate, including their secretariats, committees, and members. The bill is scheduled to be taken up next week in the Cabinet.</p>
<p>According to<a href="https://www.dawn.com/news/1736133"><em> Dawn,</em></a> the Centre for Peace and Development Initiatives (CPDI) has urged the lawmakers to reject the proposed amendment, deeming it &#8220;regressive&#8221;.</p>
<p>In letters written to lawmakers, the CPDI said the efforts to weaken laws should be rejected and instead the citizens&#8217; access to the information must be strengthened.</p>
<p>PPP leader Farhatullah Babar also said expressed concerns over the proposed amendment, saying &#8220;By excluding itself from RTI Act 2017, refusing transparency while demanding transparency from all other state institutions the parliament is only ridiculing itself. Pity. Parliament bemoaning that it is not respected sounds hollow.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">By excluding itself from RTI Act 2017, refusing transparency while demanding transparency from all other state institutions the parliament is only ridiculing itself. Pity. Parliament bemoaning that it is not respected sounds hollow <a href="https://t.co/l5LCLAHeDZ">https://t.co/l5LCLAHeDZ</a></p>
<p>— Farhatullah Babar (@FarhatullahB) <a href="https://twitter.com/FarhatullahB/status/1623585647230586880?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2023</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><br />
Former Punjab Information Commissioner Mukhtar Ahmad Ali questioned the PTI senator for proposing the amendment, saying that the proposed changes to the act will make &#8220;parliament less transparent&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Isn’t it <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ImranKhanPTI</a> Sb highly hypocritical that your party talks of transparency in governance, but your party Senator <a href="https://twitter.com/WalidIqbalPTI?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@WalidIqbalPTI</a> joins a move to make <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Parliament?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Parliament</a> less transparent by excluding it from the purview of Right of Access to Information Act 2017. <a href="https://twitter.com/FaisalJavedKhan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@FaisalJavedKhan</a> <a href="https://t.co/xNjivdcwgJ">https://t.co/xNjivdcwgJ</a></p>
<p>— Mukhtar Ahmad Ali مختار (@mqur2001) <a href="https://twitter.com/mqur2001/status/1623616533313499146?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2023</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<div class="saboxplugin-wrap" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope itemprop="author"><div class="saboxplugin-tab"><div class="saboxplugin-gravatar"><img decoding="async" src="https://dissenttoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IqXH851P_400x400-2.jpg" width="100"  height="100" alt="" itemprop="image"></div><div class="saboxplugin-authorname"><a href="https://dissenttoday.net/author/news-desk/" class="vcard author" rel="author"><span class="fn">News Desk</span></a></div><div class="saboxplugin-desc"><div itemprop="description"></div></div><div class="saboxplugin-web "><a href="https://dissenttoday.net" target="_self" >dissenttoday.net</a></div><div class="clearfix"></div></div></div><p>The post <a href="https://dissenttoday.net/news/rti-act-pti-lawmaker-wants-citizens-access-to-parliaments-records-restricted/">RTI Act: PTI Lawmaker Wants Citizens&#8217; Access To Parliament&#8217;s Records Restricted</a> appeared first on <a href="https://dissenttoday.net">Dissent Today</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dissenttoday.net/news/rti-act-pti-lawmaker-wants-citizens-access-to-parliaments-records-restricted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
