<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>national assembly Archives - Dissent Today</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dissenttoday.net/tag/national-assembly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dissenttoday.net/tag/national-assembly/</link>
	<description>Speaking Truth to Power</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2023 10:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Legislatue Fights Back: Another Bill Regulating Suo Motu Litigations Passed By National Assembly</title>
		<link>https://dissenttoday.net/news/legislatue-fights-back-another-bill-regulating-suo-motu-litigations-passed-by-national-assembly/</link>
					<comments>https://dissenttoday.net/news/legislatue-fights-back-another-bill-regulating-suo-motu-litigations-passed-by-national-assembly/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News Desk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2023 10:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dissenttoday.net/?p=3244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In response to the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision to halt the implementation of a bill limiting the Chief Justice of Pakistan&#8217;s (CJP) discretionary powers, the Parliament has fought back with another bill regulating suo motu litigation. The government had convened a National Assembly sitting ahead of schedule and approved a bill regulating suo motu litigations and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://dissenttoday.net/news/legislatue-fights-back-another-bill-regulating-suo-motu-litigations-passed-by-national-assembly/">Legislatue Fights Back: Another Bill Regulating Suo Motu Litigations Passed By National Assembly</a> appeared first on <a href="https://dissenttoday.net">Dissent Today</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision to halt the implementation of a bill limiting the Chief Justice of Pakistan&#8217;s (CJP) discretionary powers, the Parliament has fought back with another bill regulating suo motu litigation.</p>
<p>The government had convened a National Assembly sitting ahead of schedule and approved a bill regulating suo motu litigations and passed two resolutions targeting the judiciary for &#8220;exceeding its institutional mandate&#8221;.</p>
<p>Amid institutional wrangling, an eight-member larger bench of the Supreme Court had preemptively barred the implementation of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023 that limits the Chief Justice of Pakistan&#8217;s discretionary powers.</p>
<p>The move was widely criticised by the coalition government, as well as the legal fraternity.</p>
<p>In response, the government convened a National Assembly sitting and passed a bill, titled the Supreme Court (Review of Judgements and Orders) Bill, 2023.</p>
<p>Tabled by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz’s Shaza Fatima Khawaja, the bill was aimed at &#8220;facilitating and strengthening the Supreme Court in exercising its powers to review its judgements and orders&#8221;.</p>
<p>If the bill is passed, it will give the right of appeal to the aggrieved party in suo motu cases. The review petition would be heard by a larger bench than the original one, <em><a href="https://tribune.com.pk/story/2412120/na-moves-to-further-regulate-suo-motu-litigation">Express Tribune</a></em> reported.</p>
<p>According to the bill, any individual who files a review petition can be allowed to hire the services of a lawyer of their choice rather than the current policy of utilising the same lawyer who had argued the initial case.</p>
<div class="saboxplugin-wrap" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope itemprop="author"><div class="saboxplugin-tab"><div class="saboxplugin-gravatar"><img decoding="async" src="https://dissenttoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IqXH851P_400x400-2.jpg" width="100"  height="100" alt="" itemprop="image"></div><div class="saboxplugin-authorname"><a href="https://dissenttoday.net/author/news-desk/" class="vcard author" rel="author"><span class="fn">News Desk</span></a></div><div class="saboxplugin-desc"><div itemprop="description"></div></div><div class="saboxplugin-web "><a href="https://dissenttoday.net" target="_self" >dissenttoday.net</a></div><div class="clearfix"></div></div></div><p>The post <a href="https://dissenttoday.net/news/legislatue-fights-back-another-bill-regulating-suo-motu-litigations-passed-by-national-assembly/">Legislatue Fights Back: Another Bill Regulating Suo Motu Litigations Passed By National Assembly</a> appeared first on <a href="https://dissenttoday.net">Dissent Today</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dissenttoday.net/news/legislatue-fights-back-another-bill-regulating-suo-motu-litigations-passed-by-national-assembly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
