<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wikipedia Archives - Dissent Today</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dissenttoday.net/tag/wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dissenttoday.net/tag/wikipedia/</link>
	<description>Speaking Truth to Power</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 07:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>&#8216;Shameless Breach Of Rights&#8217;: Netizens Question Why Wikipedia Was Blocked in Pakistan</title>
		<link>https://dissenttoday.net/news/shameless-breach-of-rights-netizens-question-why-wikipedia-was-blocked-in-pakistan/</link>
					<comments>https://dissenttoday.net/news/shameless-breach-of-rights-netizens-question-why-wikipedia-was-blocked-in-pakistan/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News Desk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 07:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blasphemy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia ban]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dissenttoday.net/?p=1499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Social media users have demanded that the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) answer why Wikipedia was blocked in Pakistan in the first place, terming the ban a &#8220;shameless breach of the constitutional right to information&#8221;. PTA banned Wikipedia for two days over alleged blasphemous content. The ban was lifted after Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif&#8217;s orders to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://dissenttoday.net/news/shameless-breach-of-rights-netizens-question-why-wikipedia-was-blocked-in-pakistan/">&#8216;Shameless Breach Of Rights&#8217;: Netizens Question Why Wikipedia Was Blocked in Pakistan</a> appeared first on <a href="https://dissenttoday.net">Dissent Today</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media users have demanded that the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) answer why Wikipedia was blocked in Pakistan in the first place, terming the ban a &#8220;shameless breach of the constitutional right to information&#8221;.</p>
<p>PTA banned Wikipedia for two days over alleged blasphemous content. The ban was lifted after Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif&#8217;s orders to the country&#8217;s telecom regulator to restore Wikipedia.</p>
<p>Lawyer Hassan Kamal Watoo said the PTA was answerable as to why they &#8220;shamelessly breached&#8221; people&#8217;s &#8220;constitutional right to information&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Wikipedia has been unblocked. But why are you pretending like nothing happened, <a href="https://twitter.com/PTAofficialpk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PTAofficialpk</a>? Do the Pakistani people not deserve an apology after you shamelessly breached their constitutional right to information?</p>
<p>— Wattoo (@hkwattoo1) <a href="https://twitter.com/hkwattoo1/status/1622910224179900416?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 7, 2023</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>Barrister Yasif Latif Hamdani tweeted: &#8220;The reason for its ban was because of a certain Lahore High Court judge who &#8211; in an anti Ahmadi petition &#8211; ordered the removal of the page Ahmaddiya translation of Quran.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">I am happy to report that Wikipedia will be unblocked very soon (no thanks to me) on the PM’s order.</p>
<p>The reason for its ban was because of a certain Lahore High Court judge who &#8211; in an anti Ahmadi petition &#8211; ordered the removal of the page Ahmaddiya translation of Quran.</p>
<p>— Yasser Latif Hamdani (@theRealYLH) <a href="https://twitter.com/theRealYLH/status/1622635271769718788?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 6, 2023</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>On the other hand, some claimed that the PTA banned the website due to content related to General (r) Qamar Bajwa.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">So this was the &#8220;sacrilegious&#8221; &amp; &#8220;blasphemous material&#8221; Gen Incharge of PTA wanted to remove from Wikipedia? <a href="https://t.co/3CDgxgnHdK">https://t.co/3CDgxgnHdK</a></p>
<p>— Moeed Pirzada (@MoeedNj) <a href="https://twitter.com/MoeedNj/status/1622723028151836672?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 6, 2023</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><br />
Meanwhile, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan condemned the PTA&#8217;s decision to block the site, and said, &#8220;the PTA&#8217;s decision to ban Wikipedia betrays a wilful lack of understanding of the role that social media play in allowing people to obtain, fact-check, share and respond to news and information.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">The <a href="https://twitter.com/PTAofficialpk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PTAofficialpk</a>&#8216;s decision to ban Wikipedia betrays a wilful lack of understanding of the role that social media play in allowing people to obtain, fact-check, share and respond to news and information. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/wikipediaBlocked?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#wikipediaBlocked</a> <a href="https://t.co/UGRsww6nZB">pic.twitter.com/UGRsww6nZB</a></p>
<p>— Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (@HRCP87) <a href="https://twitter.com/HRCP87/status/1622180140913512448?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 5, 2023</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<div class="saboxplugin-wrap" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope itemprop="author"><div class="saboxplugin-tab"><div class="saboxplugin-gravatar"><img decoding="async" src="https://dissenttoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IqXH851P_400x400-2.jpg" width="100"  height="100" alt="" itemprop="image"></div><div class="saboxplugin-authorname"><a href="https://dissenttoday.net/author/news-desk/" class="vcard author" rel="author"><span class="fn">News Desk</span></a></div><div class="saboxplugin-desc"><div itemprop="description"></div></div><div class="saboxplugin-web "><a href="https://dissenttoday.net" target="_self" >dissenttoday.net</a></div><div class="clearfix"></div></div></div><p>The post <a href="https://dissenttoday.net/news/shameless-breach-of-rights-netizens-question-why-wikipedia-was-blocked-in-pakistan/">&#8216;Shameless Breach Of Rights&#8217;: Netizens Question Why Wikipedia Was Blocked in Pakistan</a> appeared first on <a href="https://dissenttoday.net">Dissent Today</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dissenttoday.net/news/shameless-breach-of-rights-netizens-question-why-wikipedia-was-blocked-in-pakistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
