<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>women rights Archives - Dissent Today</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dissenttoday.net/tag/women-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dissenttoday.net/tag/women-rights/</link>
	<description>Speaking Truth to Power</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:52:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Pakistan&#8217;s Top Court Upholds Death Sentence in Murder of Woman Killed For Obtaining Divorce</title>
		<link>https://dissenttoday.net/news/pakistans-top-court-upholds-death-sentence-in-murder-of-woman-killed-for-obtaining-divorce/</link>
					<comments>https://dissenttoday.net/news/pakistans-top-court-upholds-death-sentence-in-murder-of-woman-killed-for-obtaining-divorce/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fariha Ijaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 21:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women rights in pakistan]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dissenttoday.net/?p=9140</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ISLAMABAD &#8211; Pakistan’s highest court on Saturday rejected an appeal by a man convicted of murdering his former wife just two days after she secured a judicial divorce, declaring that women who exercise their legal rights must not face violence with impunity. In a strongly worded judgment, a three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://dissenttoday.net/news/pakistans-top-court-upholds-death-sentence-in-murder-of-woman-killed-for-obtaining-divorce/">Pakistan&#8217;s Top Court Upholds Death Sentence in Murder of Woman Killed For Obtaining Divorce</a> appeared first on <a href="https://dissenttoday.net">Dissent Today</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1adg3ll r-1g7jtus r-1x3r274"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1x3r274"><strong>ISLAMABAD &#8211;</strong> Pakistan’s highest court on Saturday rejected an appeal by a man convicted of murdering his former wife just two days after she secured a judicial divorce, declaring that women who exercise their legal rights must not face violence with impunity.</span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1adg3ll r-1g7jtus r-1x3r274"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1x3r274">In a strongly worded judgment, a three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar ruled that the killing struck at the heart of constitutional protections for life, dignity, and equality. The court found no grounds to overturn the concurrent convictions or the death sentence handed down to Wasim Abbas.</span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1adg3ll r-1g7jtus r-1x3r274"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1x3r274">The case centered on the October 11, 2020, shooting of Shehnaz Bibi in Lahore. According to the prosecution, Abbas, armed with a pistol and accompanied by two unidentified men, forced his way into the home of Irshad Begum around 3 p.m. He entered a room where Shehnaz Bibi and another woman were resting, taunted her over her successful demand for divorce, and fired multiple shots. She suffered six gunshot wounds to her abdomen, hand, thighs, and back; an accomplice fired an additional shot below her right knee. Shehnaz Bibi died at the scene.</span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1adg3ll r-1g7jtus r-1x3r274"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1x3r274">An ex parte divorce decree in her favor had been issued only 48 hours earlier, on October 9, 2020. The Supreme Court noted that the motive was deep resentment over her lawful exercise of rights under Pakistan’s Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act of 1939 and the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance of 1961.</span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1adg3ll r-1g7jtus r-1x3r274"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1x3r274">Justice Kakar, writing for the bench that also included Justices Salahuddin Panhwar and Ishtiaq Ibrahim, stressed the court’s constitutional duty under Articles 9, 14, and 25 to safeguard the life, dignity, and equal treatment of all citizens, including women. </span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1adg3ll r-1g7jtus r-1x3r274"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1x3r274">Citing a 2019 precedent, the judgment affirmed that a woman seeking legal dissolution of marriage through the courts is exercising a fundamental right. Violence against her for doing so, the court said, must be met with the full force of the law.</span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1adg3ll r-1g7jtus r-1x3r274"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1x3r274">The trial court had convicted Abbas of murder under Section 302(b) of the Pakistan Penal Code and sentenced him to deatH, along with compensation of 500,000 rupees to the legal heirs. He also received a concurrent 10-year rigorous imprisonment term and fine for house trespass. The Lahore High Court upheld the verdict in June 2025.</span></span></span><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1adg3ll r-1g7jtus r-1x3r274"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1x3r274">The Supreme Court described the eyewitness testimony of Irshad Begum and Naeem Bibi, both residents of the house, as reliable and confidence-inspiring.</span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1adg3ll r-1g7jtus r-1x3r274"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3 r-1x3r274">Rejecting any call for leniency, the bench characterized the crime as exceptionally brutal, calculated, premeditated, and cold-blooded, carried out inside the victim’s family home in ruthless defiance of the law.</span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>While Pakistan’s law guarantees women the right to seek judicial dissolution of marriage, women who pursue divorce frequently encounter deep social stigma, family pressure, and practical barriers that make this legal right difficult to exercise in practice.</div>
</div>
<div class="saboxplugin-wrap" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope itemprop="author"><div class="saboxplugin-tab"><div class="saboxplugin-gravatar"><img alt='Fariha Ijaz' src='https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4c0b0f02023812496c1af8a1635fd235c6f9cdb48a109fbb2c12bae7db117a39?s=100&#038;d=mm&#038;r=g' srcset='https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4c0b0f02023812496c1af8a1635fd235c6f9cdb48a109fbb2c12bae7db117a39?s=200&#038;d=mm&#038;r=g 2x' class='avatar avatar-100 photo' height='100' width='100' itemprop="image"/></div><div class="saboxplugin-authorname"><a href="https://dissenttoday.net/author/farihaijaz/" class="vcard author" rel="author"><span class="fn">Fariha Ijaz</span></a></div><div class="saboxplugin-desc"><div itemprop="description"><p>The writer is an Assistant Editor at Dissent Today, focusing on extremism and political violence.</p>
</div></div><div class="clearfix"></div></div></div><p>The post <a href="https://dissenttoday.net/news/pakistans-top-court-upholds-death-sentence-in-murder-of-woman-killed-for-obtaining-divorce/">Pakistan&#8217;s Top Court Upholds Death Sentence in Murder of Woman Killed For Obtaining Divorce</a> appeared first on <a href="https://dissenttoday.net">Dissent Today</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dissenttoday.net/news/pakistans-top-court-upholds-death-sentence-in-murder-of-woman-killed-for-obtaining-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multan Admin Refuses NOC To Aurat March, &#8216;Misbehaves&#8217; With Rally Organisers</title>
		<link>https://dissenttoday.net/news/multan-admin-refuses-noc-to-aurat-march-misbehaves-with-rally-organisers/</link>
					<comments>https://dissenttoday.net/news/multan-admin-refuses-noc-to-aurat-march-misbehaves-with-rally-organisers/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News Desk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 09:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurat March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurat March Multan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women rights]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dissenttoday.net/?p=2094</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite Punjab Interim Information Minister Amir Mir&#8217;s assurance that the government will not hinder the Aurat March rallies in the province, the District Commissioner Multan has denied the request of the Aurat March organising committee to issue a No Objection Certificate for holding a rally at Nawan Shehr Chowk, Multan. According to the organising committee [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://dissenttoday.net/news/multan-admin-refuses-noc-to-aurat-march-misbehaves-with-rally-organisers/">Multan Admin Refuses NOC To Aurat March, &#8216;Misbehaves&#8217; With Rally Organisers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://dissenttoday.net">Dissent Today</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite Punjab Interim Information Minister Amir Mir&#8217;s assurance that the government will not hinder the Aurat March rallies in the province, the District Commissioner Multan has denied the request of the Aurat March organising committee to issue a No Objection Certificate for holding a rally at Nawan Shehr Chowk, Multan.</p>
<p>According to the organising committee of the Aurat March Multan, the city administration also misbehaved with the Aurat March organisers.</p>
<p>The Aurat March is held annually to observe International Women’s Day across several cities in Pakistan, including Lahore, Karachi, Islamabad, Quetta, and Multan among others.</p>
<p>The basic demands behind the march are equal opportunities for everyone, including transgenders and women; raising awareness regarding gender-based violence, and calling on authorities to make laws in this regard. The demands also include risks related to climate change and the exploitation of the poor that comes with it among many other issues.</p>
<p>However, the organisers of the March face resistance from the government and regressive elements in society every year.</p>
<p>The Aurat March Multan&#8217;s organisers condemned the move, deeming it an attack on their right to peaceful protest. They also vowed to find a way to &#8220;raise their voices for gender equality, climate justice, and women and Trans Rights&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">DC Multan&#8217;s decision to deny permission for Aurat March at Nawan Shehar Chowk is an attack on our right to peaceful protest. But we will not be deterred. We will find another way to raise our voices for gender equality, Climate Justice and Women and Trans Rights.</p>
<p>— Aurat March Multan- عورت مارچ ملتان (@AuratMarchMultn) <a href="https://twitter.com/AuratMarchMultn/status/1632627576207179779?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2023</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>The Aurat March organisers also said that they were not welcomed at the DC&#8217;s Office as &#8220;women and trans are ridiculed for being outspoken about their rights&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Outrageous behavior of <a href="https://twitter.com/DeputyMultan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@DeputyMultan</a> towards us, at his office we were shown the door while other men were asked to sit and have tea. Women and Trans are ridiculed for being outspoken about their rights. Shame on them <a href="https://t.co/LemjOVRU8S">https://t.co/LemjOVRU8S</a></p>
<p>— Aurat March Multan- عورت مارچ ملتان (@AuratMarchMultn) <a href="https://twitter.com/AuratMarchMultn/status/1632632335957991424?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2023</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/DeputyMultan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@DeputyMultan</a> The audacity through which this Man has commented on our Counsel Lubna Nadeem disregarding her individuality in front of his office. We are enraged at this disrespectful behavior of DC Multan that a man as counsel is reasonable and a female lawyer is unreasonable.</p>
<p>— Aurat March Multan- عورت مارچ ملتان (@AuratMarchMultn) <a href="https://twitter.com/AuratMarchMultn/status/1632652076550430721?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2023</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><br />
The Lahore administration also <a href="https://dissenttoday.net/news/aurat-march-organisers-move-lhc-against-city-admins-ban-on-rally/">denied</a> permission for the rally in the city, citing “controversial” placards and the likelihood of clashes with members of Jamaat-i-Islami’s ‘Haya March’ as grounds for the rejection.<br />
Aurat March organising committee has challenged the denial of permission in the Lahore High Court.</p>
<div class="saboxplugin-wrap" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope itemprop="author"><div class="saboxplugin-tab"><div class="saboxplugin-gravatar"><img decoding="async" src="https://dissenttoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/IqXH851P_400x400-2.jpg" width="100"  height="100" alt="" itemprop="image"></div><div class="saboxplugin-authorname"><a href="https://dissenttoday.net/author/news-desk/" class="vcard author" rel="author"><span class="fn">News Desk</span></a></div><div class="saboxplugin-desc"><div itemprop="description"></div></div><div class="saboxplugin-web "><a href="https://dissenttoday.net" target="_self" >dissenttoday.net</a></div><div class="clearfix"></div></div></div><p>The post <a href="https://dissenttoday.net/news/multan-admin-refuses-noc-to-aurat-march-misbehaves-with-rally-organisers/">Multan Admin Refuses NOC To Aurat March, &#8216;Misbehaves&#8217; With Rally Organisers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://dissenttoday.net">Dissent Today</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dissenttoday.net/news/multan-admin-refuses-noc-to-aurat-march-misbehaves-with-rally-organisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
